IPhone Loses Market Share in Fourth Quarter

(By:  The Wall Street Journal)

In the last quarter, Apple Inc.’s iPhone did something it’s rarely done before: lose market share.
Worldwide, the iconic device accounted for 16.6% of smartphone sales in the fourth quarter, dropping from 18.1% in the third, according to data compiled by ABI Research.

Apple’s sales still grew, just not as quickly as everybody else’s. Apple sold 8.7 million iPhones in the fourth quarter, which is 18% more than in the quarter before. But the overall smartphone market grew 26% in the same period of time, as Motorola Inc. introduced its first devices on Google Inc.’s Android platform and Nokia Oyj boosted its sales by 4.6 million alone.
The last time the iPhone took a dip in market share was in the fourth quarter of 2008, according to ABI Research. Michael Morgan, an analyst at the firm, says Apple could be running into a case of “Razr burn.” In 2004, Motorola launched the Razr phone, which shot to the top of the charts. But after a little over two years of selling the same device with the same look, it dropped in popularity.
That of course is a little rich. The California device maker still enjoys profit margins among the industry’s highest. And the attention it commands is unrivaled (see the frenzy around the iPad unveiling last week). An Apple spokeswoman declined to comment.
The iPhone is still the measuring stick for new phones and has influenced the industry quite disproportionate to its share, however that may fluctuate. But for Apple, says Mr. Morgan, “To lose market share in a record quarter, that’s got to sting a little bit.”

Parodia de Nintendo Wii en Los Simpsons

(By:Mediotiempo.com)

La temporada número 21 de Los Simpsons se puede ver en Estados Unidos desde sepriembre pasado, y en el último episodio, proyectado el domingo pasado, la familia amarilla se encargó de parodiar al Nintendo Wii.

En el capítulo llamado «Million Dollar Maybe, los residentes del asilo de ancianos están algo deprimidos por no poder ver la TV debido a la falta de un convertidor; Lisa, que está visitando al abuelo Simpson en ese momento, decide tomar cartas en el asunto. Al llegar a la tienda de electrónicos, la hermana mejor de Bart ve cuánto se divierte el señor Burns jugando el Zii Sports y el Call of Duty: World at War en el Funtendo Zii, por lo que se convence de comprar una de estas consolas para los viejitos.
Luego de no tomar muy bien la noticia, los habitantes del Castillo del Retiro de Springfield terminan felices jugando al Zii Sports con todo y los sonidos originales incluidos.

Gobierno Mexicano quiere poner restricciones a Twitter

Mexicans are using Twitter to avoid drunk-driving checkpoints. Drug cartels might be using it too. Does that justify restricting social networking sites?
Mexico – Mexico has racked up its fair share of menacingly named outlaws in a three-year drug war: the Zetas, Aztecas and even a band of female assassins called the Panthers.
Now, if the government gets its way, another name will also make the wanted list: los Twitteros.
That’s right. Twitter users are fast becoming public enemy No. 1, at least in Mexico City, where they have angered authorities by warning one another of roadside «alcoholimetro» — or Breathalyzer — checkpoints set up by the police.
But the case against the Twitteros is about more than alcohol.
Mexico is, after all, a country at war — at least according to President Felipe Calderon, who launched the crackdown on drug cartels shortly after taking office. Three years later, the streets of border cities like Ciudad Juarez and Tijuana remain full of soldiers. In many ways, the government is still playing catch-up to the nation’s criminals.
In this context, the issue of the Twitteros has quickly expanded into an argument over whether public safety takes priority over free speech in a country struggling to contain serious social ills. Fearing that kidnappers and drug cartels use Twitter, Facebook or MySpace to communicate, the Mexican government is considering a bill to restrict social networking websites and to set up a police force to monitor them.
The Twitter feed in question, Anti Alcoholimetro, doesn’t hide its intent. On any given night, a dozen people write in listing the time and location where they saw a police checkpoint, helping others to avoid it.
The government’s response has been erratic. At first, city officials said tweeting the location of police checkpoints was a crime, akin to helping someone break the law, and vowed to find a way to prosecute Twitteros. But after a media frenzy, they quickly backed down.
«We’re not taking any action against the Twitteros,» said Othon Sanchez, director of preventative programs for Mexico City’s public safety office.
«I don’t think it’s a crime to say, ‘Hey, I just passed Reforma Avenue and there’s an alcoholimetro,'» he said. «But it is an irresponsible act because here in Mexico drunk driving is a serious problem. We see it on a daily basis.»
In fact, Sanchez said the Twitteros had been a blessing in disguise: their tweets have helped publicize the alcoholimetros and spurred his office to launch its own Twitter campaign in support of the program.
Yet the right to tweet is far from guaranteed, even in the relatively liberal capital of Mexico City. Article 320 of the city’s penal code prescribes prison terms of up to five years for those who «in any way help a delinquent avoid investigation by the authorities or escape their actions.»
If that seems vague, it is. But federal lawmakers are quickly working on specific legislation to track down and punish Twitteros who break the law or help others escape it.
«We have to regulate these websites to make sure there aren’t people breaking the law, making death threats or committing crimes via electronic means,» said Nazario Norberto, a federal representative and member of the leftist Revolutionary Democratic Party (PRD).
Although Twitter asks users to abide by local laws, it and other social networking websites are currently completely unregulated and un-policed in Mexico, according to Norberto.
He says his bill is still in the works, but is modeled in part after a controversial Spanish bill that would allow judges to shut down websites that, according to the government, help people break copyrights and other laws.
The Spanish bill has already drawn fierce criticism from civil liberties groups. But Norberto denies his bill would restrict free speech. Instead, he argues, it would keep Twitteros from sharing private government data about the location of alcoholimetros.
«This isn’t public information because the federal police and public safety officials set up these roadblocks without telling anyone where they’ll be,» he insisted. «That’s the whole point.»
If passed, the bill would do much more than prevent Twitterers from revealing Breathalyzer checkpoints. It would also create a «cybernetic police force» to scour the web for crime, including kidnappings and drug activity, Norberto said.
His bill reflects a growing fear in Mexico that kidnapping rings and drug cartels are using social networking sites like Twitter to do business.
«It’s a way for drug cartels to locate targets,» said Ghaleb Krame, a security expert at Alliant International University in Mexico City.
«Facebook and Twitter have lots of weaknesses,» he said. «For instance, criminals can find out who are the family members of someone who has a high rank in the police. Perhaps they don’t have an account on Twitter or Facebook, but their children and close family probably do.»
Indeed, a recent string of killings suggest drug cartels are more web-savvy than the police. In December, a marine was killed during an operation to capture one of Mexico’s most wanted drug lords, Arturo Beltran Leyva, who also died in the shootout. Less than a week later, gunmen attacked the marine’s home, killing his mother and three relatives.
«How did they know where his parents lived?» Krame asked, suggesting that the cartel could have used websites like Facebook to track down the family. «Drug traffickers have an intelligence network and, as far as I know, at this moment in time it’s more effective than ours.»
While he seconds Rep. Norberto’s call for police to mine Twitter and Facebook for data, Krame said any attempt to restrict social networking websites would be a mistake.
«We have to play within the rules of the game,» Krame said. «These are open sources. If we try to regulate them we’re just going to end up like China battling Google.»
«We can’t go down that path,» he added. «It would be absolutely anti-democratic.»

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.

Hallar empleo en México lleva 6 meses

(By: CNNExpansión.com)

El 76% de quienes buscan un trabajo tarda medio año para colocarse, según una encuesta; la búsqueda puede llegar al año mientras el aspirante encuentra una plaza acorde a su experiencia.

<!–Más noticias de mi-carrera

CIUDAD DE MÉXICO (CNNExpansión.com) — El 76% de quienes buscan empleo en México tardan en promedio 6 meses para colocarse, de acuerdo con la encuesta Motivaciones del Mexicano en el Trabajo. Aunque existen algunas vacantes en el mercado, este proceso puede extenderse hasta un año completo, tiempo en el que el aspirante encuentra algún puesto acorde a la experiencia que tiene, según el análisis de la compañía de soluciones de Recursos Humanos, Randstad México que realizó una encuesta a 1,367 personas de entre 25 y 35 años durante enero de 2010.
Este periodo se mantiene igual sin importar si el aspirante es egresado de una maestría o sólo terminó la secundaria, lo que pone de manifiesto la importancia de la especialización y definición de objetivos laborales concretos que impulsen el desarrollo de carrera y de la empresa.
«En el mundo actual las personas deben preocuparse más por la especialización, y por definir un plan para la búsqueda de empleo, por lo que deben conocer qué buscan las empresas, qué pueden ofrecer al mercado y cómo explotar sus cualidades», dice el director general de Randstad México, Alejandro Álvarez.
La planeación es fundamental para competir por mejores oportunidades, actualmente el 95% de quienes buscan trabajo se encuentran desempleadas, por lo que tiene un margen menor de negociación y aceptan ofertas que incluso están por debajo de su perfil laboral.
Esto sumado a la poca especialización obliga a los trabajadores a no ampliar sus horizontes para desarrollarse en diferentes ramas y limitar el crecimiento laboral.
El sueldo es el mayor estímulo que se toma en cuenta para elegir un empleo, y lo que menos importa es la distancia que existe entre el área de trabajo y la casa del aspirante.
No obstante muchas empresas toman en cuenta el aspecto de la distancia para reclutar personal activo.
El factor más importante para mantener un empleo en México es el sueldo y las prestaciones, secundado por el trabajo que se desempeña, el plan de carrera y el ambiente laboral.
También se toma en cuenta en renombre de la empresa donde se labora y el reconocimiento de los superiores.

Bear With Us – Excelente puntada de Grooveshark

Going down for a bit. That’s what she said.

To those of you who were redirected here, we apologize.
In an attempt to befriend Asian investors and increase office morale, we here at Grooveshark established some connections with the Chinese black market and imported our very own black-and-white Giant Panda (hereby known as «Pickles»). Unfortunately, due to circumstances no one could have foreseen, Pickles became agitated at the fluorescent lights and near-constant belly rubs and began clawing at our computers.
Pickles is currently thrashing about in the server room, causing the technical difficulties and temporary outage you just experienced. As soon as our interns return from Pier 1 with synthetic bamboo, a picnic basket and an oversized net, we will be able to return the servers back to normal and, if we can, rescue the coder that Pickles has taken as a prize.
Thank you for your patience.

Would You Buy an iPad? Wired Readers Weigh In

(By:Wired.com)

ipad42
The Apple iPad tablet is finally here, but it hasn’t drawn quite the same cheer from Apple enthusiasts and gadget fans that some observers expected.
About 60 percent of the 1,114 readers that took Wired.com’s iPad poll said they would not buy the iPod. Some 41 percent of the 892 readers who took a separate poll said the tablet did not live up to its hype, though they expect it to find a home among high-end consumers.
The quick verdict: “It’s an iPod Touch on steroids.”
ipad-poll-snapshot1
The iPad name was the focus of many jokes with, predictably, the comments hitting the “pad” aspect of it.
“I think they should have gone with iSlate for the name,” commenter Navi101 wrote in response to our live coverage of the event. “iPad makes me think of feminine products.”
There’s more. The Jezebel blog, written for women, published an entire article summing up the “best period-related iPad jokes.”
“Not gonna lie, the name iPad makes me shudder a bit,” tweeted Lisa Gumerman. “Kind of even makes me less interested in buying it.”
The iPad name is also symptomatic of the lack of women engineers in IT, said Eve Tahmincioglu on the Huffington Post blog.
“I suspect a room full of female computer engineers would not have named Apple’s new cybertablet the iPad,” she wrote. “This naming faux pas is a perfect example of why we need more women IT professionals in this world. Apple wants women to buy these gizmos, but is anyone really thinking about us gals?”
Still some Apple fans says that customers are likely to warm up to the name after the initial reaction. “It’s a poorly chosen name. But so was Wii, and everyone got over those jokes after the first week,” tweeted Rob Sheridan, creative director for Nine Inch Nails.
Other users focused on the real shortcomings of the device. “What? iPad has no [Adobe] Flash player. That’s what it needs for so many websites. That’s not good,” tweeted Andrea Bakes.
Others pointed to the lack of USB port and multitasking in the device as features that will be missed.
“I don’t understand no multitasking, I mean how can you expect anyone to use this for work?” commented ’spitfiredd’ on Wired.com.
Though Apple’s Steve Jobs introduced the iPad as a device that would occupy the world between smartphones and laptops, potential customers aren’t convinced. A full 71 percent of 934 readers polled said they won’t buy an iPad, because they are happy with their smartphone and notebook.

ipad-poll-2
Some Apple fans are not ready to give up on the device.
“I am not a fanboy at all, and I find it absolutely awe inspiring,” commented NickSA. “This is the future. Hats off to Apple, they have done it again — though personally I would wait till the second generation [of the device] for all the bugs to get ironed out.”
Ultimately, the question is, who really needs an iPad and is the data plan worth it. “Why would you take a iPad with you if you have a iPhone? Do you need to have both?,” commented jescott418. “Why spend an amount on two service plans with AT&T two basically do the same thing? I am scratching my head at who really needs this except for the base model for a coffee table piece.”
And as for the publishing industry, where some had pinned their hopes on the tablet, the iPad is unlikely to prove to be the digital savior that was wished for. About 59 percent of 824 readers who took the poll say the iPad won’t save the publishing industry.
That’s a few hundred readers that publishers won’t be able to count on.

Read More http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/01/apples-ipad-muted-response/#ixzz0dvBKXCve

Porqué te amo

Si no te amara me quedaría aquí un rato más,
esperaría a que todo saliera mal para poderme ir,
podría ver en tus ojos el dolor y el odio,
y entonces irme cuando ya absolutamente todo,
arda en llamas.

Pero te amo tanto que prefiero irme,
y privarme del placer de tu cariño,
de tus besos y tu absoluta perfección,
prefiero verte en otros brazos feliz,
que llorar contra mi pecho,
prefiero sufrir en silencio,
que seguirnos gritando.

Te amo tanto que debo ser fuerte,
y dejar de pensar con mis instintos,
debo poner antes que mis deseos,
nuestro amor,
Pensar como te puedo dar más amor,
y tal vez es estando lejos de tí.

Al final tu belleza te acompañará siempre,
y más de mil noches tus manos extrañaré,
pero prefiero llorar tu ausencia,
a sufrir nuestra presencia,
quedarme aquí en este punto amandote,
que ver como se nos muere el amor en las manos.

No sé si tenga el valor de afrontarlo,
o la fuerza de llevarlo a cabo,
pero debo hacerlo,
o moriré sin haberlo decidio.

Y ya no seré yo.

Hate on me – Jill Scott

If I could give you the world on a silver platter
Would it even matter? You’d still be mad at me
If I could find in all this a dozen roses
Which I would give to you, you’d still be miserable

In reality I’m gon’ be who I be and I don’t feel no faults
For all the lies that you bought
You can try as you may, break me down when I say
That it ain’t up to you, gonna do what you do

Hate on me, hater, now or later
‘Cause I’m gonna do me, you’ll be mad, baby
Go ‘head and hate on me, hater, I’m not afraid of
What I got I paid for, you can hate on me

Ooh, if I gave you peaches outta my own garden
And I made you a peach pie, would you slap me out?
Wonder if I gave you diamonds out of my own womb
Would you feel the love in that or ask why not the moon?

If I gave you sanity for the whole of humanity
Handed all the solutions for the pain and pollution
No matter where I live, despite the things I give
You’ll always be this way, so go ‘head and

Hate on me, hater, now or later
‘Cause I’m gonna do me, you’ll be mad, baby
Go ‘head and hate on me, hater, I’m not afraid of
What I got I paid for, you can hate on me

Hate on me, hater, now or later
‘Cause I’m gonna do me, you’ll be mad, baby
Go ‘head and hate on me, hater, I’m not afraid of
What I got I paid for, you can hate on me

You cannot hate on me ‘cause my mind is free
Feel my destiny, so shall it be
You cannot hate on me ‘cause my mind is free
Feel my destiny, so shall it be

Hate on me, hater, now or later
‘Cause I’m gonna do me, you’ll be mad, baby
Go ‘head and hate on me, hater, I’m not afraid of
What I got I paid for, you can hate on me